»In nature there are neither rewards nor
punishments;
there are consequences.«
– Robert Green Ingersoll
American writer
You may know the expression »small footprint«.
Based on the assumption that everybody leaves traces or footprints behind them
with everything that they do and that these footprints are generally damaging
or at least use resources, a »small footprint« means that as little damage as
possible is caused. The expression is used in software development and also in
the environmental field. A small ecological footprint thus means that a product
or an activity causes as little damage as possible to the environment. For this
reason nature conservationists often call for a small ecological footprint.
But how would it be if we left a »beneficial
ecological footprint«? This would mean that we would not only not damage nature
with our actions but even benefit it. A beneficial ecological footprint is
created, for example, when a conventional farmer changes over to organic
farming or when a supermarket extends its range more and more in the direction
of vegan (exclusively non-animal) products which are produced organically as
far as possible. The more beneficial footprints we leave behind us, the greater
the chances are that the descent to hell is not only slowed down but the
direction is reversed.
In the previous sections a lot has been said
about measures that can promote such a reversal. The most important financial
instrument that the Natural Economy of Life has at its disposal for this
purpose is the Equalisation and Environment Fund, which provides a budget for
decontaminating our environment worldwide of an amount equal to the national
budgets of all countries together.
Much human creativity and commitment will still
be required to reverse the direction completely and permanently, thus
initiating the return home to paradise. However, the financial foundation for this
is already provided by the Equalisation and Environment Fund.
And, as always, all action has to be measured
by the threefold good and will have to meet all three criteria: does it
serve the good of the individual, the good of the community and the good of the
big scheme of things? When all three questions can be answered with a clear
»yes«, the action leaves a beneficial footprint.
No comments:
Post a Comment