»Nativity
varies and it is a well known fact that people tend to produce more offspring
during war and poverty. Some, more well off, European countries are suffering
from declining populations, bringing a threat to pension schemes, for example.«
– Einar Du Rietz
journalist and communications consultant
Here we come to a curious phenomenon: rich
countries complain about the so-called demographic change or fall in the birth
rate and poor countries about overpopulation. Apart from the fact that an
outside observer might get the idea that we humans complain about everything,
one perhaps not so obvious advantage of the Natural Economy of Life can be seen
here.
If the birth rate in rich countries is falling
while poor countries are inundated with new-borns, a monetary and economic
system that results in worldwide prosperity should lead to a fall in the birth
rate as well. This fall in the birth rate would be completely voluntary. No
measures are necessary such as are currently in force in China, where (with
some exceptions) a family is only permitted to have one child.
Isn’t it wonderful when problems are solved by
themselves and completely voluntarily? Alone this one advantage that the
overpopulation problem is solved by itself in an agreeable and voluntary manner
should be sufficient reason for introducing the Natural Economy of Life.
No comments:
Post a Comment